Miami-Dade • Broward • Palm Beach • (954) 670-1267

The Employee Source

Keeping workers informed and engaged
Antitrust

“No-poaching” Agreements & Antitrust Laws

Antitrust Guidance

In October 2016, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) under the Obama Administration issued a joint Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals.  Among other things, the HR Guidance announced that so-called “naked” agreements among employers not to recruit employees or not to compete on employee compensation would be considered per se violations of the antitrust laws and prosecuted criminally.

On January 19, 2018, at a conference sponsored by the Antitrust Research Foundation at George Mason University, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim announced that DOJ had been “very active” in reviewing potential violations of the antitrust laws resulting from agreements among employers not to compete for workers.  Reportedly, Delrahim went on to say that “[i]n the coming couple of months you will see some announcements, and to be honest with you, I’ve been shocked about how many of these there are, but they’re real.”

“No-poaching” agreements are agreements between or among two or more employers not to solicit each other’s employees.  They are similar to, but slightly different from, “no-hire” agreements (sometimes referred to as “no-switching” agreements).  A “no-poaching” agreement merely prohibits the solicitation of employees; if an employee applies without solicitation, there is no prohibition on hiring that worker.  A “no-hire” agreement prohibits the hiring of the worker even if he or she was not solicited.  It appears that DOJ considers both such agreements – if they are “naked” – to be per se unlawful and subject to criminal prosecution.

What is a “naked” agreement?  It is an agreement that stands alone.  It is not ancillary to a larger, legitimate collaboration.  Ancillary “no-hire” or “no-poaching” agreements do not violate the antitrust laws if they are reasonable in scope and duration and are reasonably necessary to further the interests of the legitimate collaboration.

In spite of the publicity given to the issuance of the HR Guidance in 2016 and high-profile class action cases such as In Re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, No. 11-CV-02509, human resources personnel and other executives often do not realize that the antitrust laws apply to the employment marketplace.  Thus, many simply are not aware that an agreement among employers not to hire employees or to exchange wage information could result in a violation of the antitrust laws.  As noted, Delrahim reportedly expressed shock at the number of potential violations DOJ is investigating even after the issuance of the HR Guidance, but this “number” may simply be the result of a lack of awareness and understanding by employers.

 

0 Response

  1. Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    Car Transporters – Free Online Vehicle Shipping Quotes from Dependable Carriers, car quotes.Car quotes
    Find a Qualified Car Transporter in your Area Get Car Shipping Quotes Now Shipping All Vehicles Statewide, Nationwide, Worldwide Compare and Save! With an industry full of choices, it can be hard to find the very best car transporters for your car moving needs. That’s why Cartransporters.org is here to help! It just takes a moment to get multiple car transport quotes from industry leading companies that are located in your area. With an extensive database of only the best, highest rated, bonded, and insured car shipping companies, we are able to provide instant price estimates for any kind of …
    The post Car Transporters – Free Online Vehicle Shipping Quotes from Dependable Carriers, car quotes.Car quotes appeared first on Cars.

    [url=http://questions.remmont.com]Trading News[/url]

Leave a Reply